Riding Herd on Runout
Toolholders with increased taper-to-taper contact, such as this Mega E collet chuck from BIG Daishowa, are useful for high-speed milling since they enable stable cutting.
Many machine shops lack objective criteria for making toolholder purchasing decisions. They say every tooling manufacturer claims high accuracy, perfect balance and large clamping forces. With so many choices and little to distinguish one toolholder from the next, most purchasing decisions are made by price alone.
However, using this criteria overlooks the critical effect that runout has on machining accuracy and tool life. Many machine shops and parts manufacturers are not aware they can improve runout significantly by using the right toolholders.
Work material:1055 steel Speed,carbide:250 sfm Speed, HSS90 sfm Feed: 0.004 ipr Hole depth: 3xD0.47 "Hole depth, 5xD: 0.60 "Drill diameter: 0.118 " (3mm)
Two important variables in determining acceptable runout are tool size and composition. With tools 3⁄4 " in diameter or larger, runout of 0.0005 " may not impair performance and tool life. However, with smaller tools runout may need to be much better than 0.0005 ".
Tool materials are also critical. For example, solid-carbide drills can last much longer than HSS drills—but only if runout is tightly controlled.
Our company conducted an informal customer survey by asking, “What is good runout?” The consensus was that good runout is 0.0005 ". We decided to evaluate this benchmark using tests of various cutting tools. Figure 1 shows data from drilling tests performed at the BIG Daishowa Mega Technical Center in Awaji, Japan. Each drill was tested under the same conditions, with only runout changed for each value.
A 3mm-dia., solid-carbide drill with 0.00008 " of runout produced 148 holes at 3 times diameter until the primary cutting edge experienced 0.008 " of wear, at which point tool life was considered to be over. A second 3mm-dia. carbide drill with 0.0002 " of runout under the same conditions produced just 125 holes using the same tool life measurement. The test was repeated two more times with runouts of 0.0004 " and 0.0006 ", with a decrease in tool life as runout increased.
The next test used the same four runout values for a 3mm-dia. HSS drill at 3 times diameter. A third test mirrored the first two, but used a 3mm.-dia. HSS drill at 5 times diameter, with through- the-tool coolant.
To summarize the results:
• Carbide has the highest sensitivity to diminished tool life due to runout. Improving runout from 0.0006 " to 0.00008 " tripled tool life of the solid-carbide drill. Keep in mind that tool users in our survey considered 0.0005 " runout to be acceptable on average.
• HSS tools were slightly less sensitive than their solid-carbide counterparts to diminished life. Improving runout from 0.0006 " to 0.00008 " produced a 230 percent improvement in tool life. Through-coolant HSS tools were even less sensitive to diminished tool life, producing only a 160 percent improvement in tool life.
If a drill does not run concentric to its centerline, higher forces are generated in the radial direction of the highest margin, causing more wear on one side.
This data was used to plot tool life efficiency based on average results for both carbide and HSS tools. From this data, tool life efficiency can be plotted based on runout, whereby theoretical “0” runout is equal to 100 percent tool life expectancy (Figure 2). At the “acceptable average” runout of 0.0005 ", tool life is cut in half.
Work material: 1055 steel Cutting speed: 300 sfm Spindle speed (rpm): 2,900 Feed rate: 0.004 "/flute Feed: 46.4 ipm Axial depth: 0.60 "Radial step: 0.004 "
Many shops use toolholders, such as 3-jaw drill chucks, that allow drill runout to exceed 0.001 ". Extrapolating from our test data, a solid-carbide drill with runout of 0.001 " would produce fewer than 25 holes. A higher-quality chuck, though more expensive, could improve tool life dramatically.
Savings can be measured in cost per hole. An average price for the 3mm-dia. carbide drills used in our test is $40. With runout of 0.00008 ", this drill can produce 148 holes, or $0.27 per hole. With runout of 0.0006 ", the cost per hole nearly triples to $0.80 per hole. As a result, manufacturers willing to accept 0.0006 " runout are passing up an opportunity to cut drilling costs by 66 percent.
BIG Daishowa ran similar tests to calculate values for a 4-flute, 10mm-dia. carbide endmill. Cutting length increased from 528 ' to 693 ', 1.3 times longer, as runout decreased from 0.0006 " to 0.00008 ". The reason is clear: With runout of only 0.00008 ", the cutting forces are evenly distributed on each flute, whereas with runout of 0.0006 ", an excessive force will be applied to only one flute. Less runout helps stabilize the cutting depth on each flute and produces a finer surface finish.
Allowable TIR should be based on different values for tools of different diameters. Figure 4 shows the constant relationship between tool diameter and runout as a function of chip load. The data is based on 0.0005 " TIR as a starting point for a ½ "-dia. tool, from which the allowable TIR can be calculated for smaller tools and their respective chip loads. For example, if a 1⁄16 " endmill with three flutes is profiling mold steel, the effective chip load is 0.0002 ipt, which means the tool will be unbalanced when runout is 0.0005 ".
Regular inspection with gage bars helps identify potential spindle problems, and can reduce downtime and spindle repairs.
Even the best collet chuck cannot deliver superior performance in an old or worn spindle. Shops should check their spindles regularly for runout using a precision gage bar. One popular gage is a simple straight bar used by slowly rotating the spindle and measuring runout with an indicator.
Dynamic runout gages are useful for high-speed machining. When the spindle is rotated at low speeds, centrifugal forces have little or no influence on runout. However, as the spindle speeds increase, centrifugal forces increase exponentially and can cause extreme runout.
A dynamic runout gage typically has a precise point for accurate measurement of laser alignment tools in the X and Y axes. Recent tests by BIG Daishowa of high-speed spindles showed that many machines, while accurate at 500 rpm, had runout exceeding 0.001 " at 30,000 rpm.
Other influences on runout include taper-to-taper contact, and the angle of the collet and corresponding clamping range. (see sidebar on page 60).
What many shops believe is acceptable runout is actually unacceptable if the shop wants to improve tool life. A manufacturer basing toolholder purchase decisions solely on the price of the toolholder may end up choosing a more expensive alternative, based on tool life and cost per hole, while sacrificing quality and accuracy.
Did you find this helpful? Let us know what you think by adding your comments or questions below.